I have been riding the commuting Trek in the pre-dawn hours using only its Novatech dyno hub and B and M front and rear LED lights. The front Lumotec is adequate for darkish and semi-lit suburban streets. But it doesn't illuminate road signs, parked cars, walkers, or oncoming unlit bicycles. So, as a compromise, I have starting use my Princetontec EOS headlamp on blinking mode, which will supposedly last 25 hours at full power, so I don't need to worry about recharging it very often.
It perfectly lights up signs, reflective pedestrians, parked cars, and even the road ahead--albeit every other second. This is a pretty good solution. Although I love the EOS light at full power, unblinking, it needs to be charged every three days. And if I ride home in the dark, it needs to be charged more often. Slight pain.
I built a dyno wheel for the slush mobile, too. So if it ever snows (I have my doubts), I'll be ready.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
More Hi-Viz and Sun Protection
I continue to experiment with all things hi-viz. I like hi-viz t-shirts for riding in, but I don't like having my arms exposed to the sun for long periods. That crusty, leathery look can't be good; my startled doctor suggested maybe I should consider covering my arms.
For a number of summers I wore a long-sleeved, super lightweight Melanzana polyester base layer, but it only came in blue and tan, so I needed to wear a hot vest in order to be hi-viz. Then I switched to long-sleeved hi-viz biking jerseys, but they were, well, biking jerseys. The pockets in back are handy, but otherwise, not what I want. So last summer I tried out arm coolers, super-thin wicking fabric that stays cool even in heat. Worn with an ordinary hi-viz t-shirt, it has been a pretty nice solution.
So next summer I'm going to try another hi-viz/sun shade product, namely a neck shade that I can fasten to my helmet. It's designed for a hard hat, not a bicycle helmet, but it fits perfectly. And it's HI_VIZ! Perhaps it's enough hi-viz that I don't need to wear a hi-viz shirt! It's certainly dorky enough that I don't need to wear a big red nose in order to look like a clown.
For a number of summers I wore a long-sleeved, super lightweight Melanzana polyester base layer, but it only came in blue and tan, so I needed to wear a hot vest in order to be hi-viz. Then I switched to long-sleeved hi-viz biking jerseys, but they were, well, biking jerseys. The pockets in back are handy, but otherwise, not what I want. So last summer I tried out arm coolers, super-thin wicking fabric that stays cool even in heat. Worn with an ordinary hi-viz t-shirt, it has been a pretty nice solution.
So next summer I'm going to try another hi-viz/sun shade product, namely a neck shade that I can fasten to my helmet. It's designed for a hard hat, not a bicycle helmet, but it fits perfectly. And it's HI_VIZ! Perhaps it's enough hi-viz that I don't need to wear a hi-viz shirt! It's certainly dorky enough that I don't need to wear a big red nose in order to look like a clown.
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Hi-Viz
I have been doing a highly scientific study of how to make bike riders more visible, and I have concluded that the best attention-getter is a hi-viz yellow-green shirt or vest. Hi-viz orange is good, too. When I'm driving, I find that I notice bikers wearing such shirts far down the road, in all conditions. I used to think that having an always-on taillight might be good, but I don't anymore. A flashing .5 watt taillight with fully charged batteries is noticeable in the daylight, but not from a mile away like a hi-viz shirt. And you rarely need to change the batteries in a shirt.
I own a couple long-sleeve hi-viz biking jerseys (to keep the sun off my arms), but my favorites are simple hi-viz t-shirts, $12 at at Walmart. Polyester, so they wick, not-too thick, so they're cool, and BRIGHT! Not what they'd wear in the Tour de France, so most American bikers wouldn't be interested, but very nice.
Does such safety wear really make a difference? It's hard to tell. Millions of bikers survive in their lo-viz clown-suit bike jerseys, so hi-viz clearly is not absolutely necessary. Still, I prefer to wear it, just in case.
I own a couple long-sleeve hi-viz biking jerseys (to keep the sun off my arms), but my favorites are simple hi-viz t-shirts, $12 at at Walmart. Polyester, so they wick, not-too thick, so they're cool, and BRIGHT! Not what they'd wear in the Tour de France, so most American bikers wouldn't be interested, but very nice.
Does such safety wear really make a difference? It's hard to tell. Millions of bikers survive in their lo-viz clown-suit bike jerseys, so hi-viz clearly is not absolutely necessary. Still, I prefer to wear it, just in case.
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Summer 2012 Trip: St. Louis to Milwaukee
June, 2012
Jon and I took a longer trip this summer, a trip that started out shorter and in a different part of the country. By the time the planning (or the lack of planning) was done, we were on our way to St. Louis, with the intention of spending the better part of two weeks riding up the Mississippi to Wisconsin, then cutting across to Milwaukee (where Jon lives).
My original plan was to load my Bike Friday into its suitcase and take the train to St. Louis. Jon would have needed to load his LHT into a bike box and check it as luggage . . . except Amtrak doesn't check luggage from Chicago to St. Louis. (Can that be true? It seems impossible . . . what an idiotic lack of service. There's no way to get a bike to St. Louis by Amtrak. This is, alas, typical. Amtrak is not interested in bike riders.)
The solution was to have Jon's incredibly generous wife drive us from Milwaukee to St. Louis (400 miles). We drove down on Saturday, she threw us and our gear out of the car, and then she turned around and headed home the same day. Yikes. She must have been really eager to be rid of Jon for a few weeks.
Our plan was to follow Adventure Cycling route guides as much as possible. I had used their route guides in a half-hearted way before, frequently jumping off the route if it seemed to be taking a longer route than I wanted, but I had never religiously followed a route guide for any distance. So this was to be an experiment.
The advantage of a route guide is that the route is picked for you. No advance planning is necessary. No county maps, no researching camp grounds, just the route guide (and a large state map for reference). We would follow the first few panels of the Lewis and Clark route from Hartford, IL to Marthasville, MO (on the Katy Trail), turn north and follow the Great Rivers South route to Muscatine, IA, and the Northern Tier segment from Muscatine to west of Dubuque, where we would turn eastward.
That was the plan. The reality was a bit different.
As usual, we camped in public and private campgrounds, with two motel nights thrown in where convenient camping couldn't be found. All but one of the campgrounds had showers, which is always nice. In total we stayed in six state or county parks, two motels, two private campgrounds, and one in-laws house.
On previous trips, we have considered days of 65 miles or so to be optimal. As a result, we frequently had 70- and even 80- or 90-mile days, with relatively few days under 60 miles. For this trip, we decided to set the standard distance at 50 miles, meaning that distances of 50-60 would be most common, 60-70 would be less common, above 70 would be only in an emergency. Furthermore, it meant that sub-50-mile days were possible, if we had to choose between that and going 70-plus miles.
We mostly stuck to that standard. We only had one day over 70 miles (with a stiff tailwind and no hills), and only two days over 60. And we did, indeed, have one day under 50 miles, something we never would have allowed in our younger, more pain-tolerant days. All the other days were in the 50-60 mile range. Since we always started out by 7:30 am, this meant we were usually done by early- to mid-afternoon.
The obligatory gear details:
I was riding my 28-year-old Trek 620 touring bike (of which only the frame is original--everything else has been swapped out), rear panniers, tent strapped on to the rear rack, front rack with a waterproof gear bag strapped to it, and a front handlebar bag fastened high up on a bracket. This worked pretty well. I carried all my clothes in the dry bag; at night, I simply unfastened it and took it into the tent. In the handlebar bag I kept the daily necessities: wallet, phone, tomtom gps unit, sunscreen, bug juice, headlamp, coin purse, maps for the day, snacks. I could have put the handlebar bag lower, perhaps directly on the dry bag, but why bother? The bike handled well enough, and I like having the bag (with my snacks and maps) up high where I can get at them.
As I was getting ready for the trip, I noticed that my fancy Velocity Synergy rear wheel was tearing itself apart, with the rim cracking in many places, and spokes pulling out. (See my post here.) I was grateful that I noticed it before we left, but it posed a dilemma: Take the clown bike (that is, the Bike Friday) which is not as good on trails (it rolls noticeably slower), or build a new wheel. I decided to try the latter. I ordered up a touring rim from Velo Orange. The old spokes were a few mm short, but they might work. Bad idea, I know, reusing spokes, particularly on a fully loaded touring wheel, but I didn't have time to get new ones.
So I laced up the wheel, trued it, dished it, stressed it, and crossed my fingers (not 3-cross). I had a week to try it out. In the 100 miles I rode that week, it seemed to be holding. The test would be when I loaded it up. (I had also built the front wheel using a Novatech dynamo hub and an old rim I had lying around, but I wasn't worried about it, since it was already two years old and had never had a problem. Besides, front wheels don't work as hard as rear wheels, nor do they have the asymmetrical stresses caused by dishing.)
I threw my bike and gear into the van on a Friday, drove over the top of Lake Michigan and down to Milwaukee (longer but infinitely worth it for avoiding Chicago), slept in Jon's basement, then, at the crack of dawn, we were off. Six hours to the St. Louis area (Hartford, IL, on the other side of the Mississippi, where Louis and Clark started, I guess). By 3:00 we were ready to go. We hoped to go 30 miles this first partial day.
We would be following the Adventure Cycling Lewis and Clark route these first two days, along the river north to the confluence of the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers before crossing into Missouri and following the Katy Trail.
So that first day, we cruised along the river on a nice off-road bike path on top of the levies as far as Alton, at which point the path follows Route 100. Jon had his first flat tire on this stretch.
Although he had three flat tires in three days, making us worry that it would be a daily annoyance for the whole trip, they did eventually stop. Flat tires are demoralizing. Not particularly problematic or time-consuming, but demoralizing. Jon's second flat tire happened just as we were starting on the second day, and his third flat tire happened at the top of a huge hill on the third day. There's never a good time for a flat, but both of those were particularly bad times.
The first night we camped in Pere Marquette State Park, which is, technically, on the Illinois River. As with most state parks, this one was quite pleasant and had showers, our big requirement. We had eaten dinner at an ice cream stand in Grafton, so the lack of grocery and restaurant didn't bother us. In general, that was our model: We looked ahead to where we'd be stopping, found the last place prior to our destination that had restaurants or groceries, and stocked up or ate there. Some nights, that meant actually buying dinner. Other nights, we bought canned beans (or their equivalent) to cook on our little alcohol stoves. Even canned beans taste good at the end of a day of riding. There's no point in trying to cook an actual meal starting with fresh wholesome ingredients. It's a giant hassle, the ingredients often cost more than a restaurant would, we can't really buy perishables if we are going to carry them any distance, our catfood can alchohol stoves aren't good for much more than boiling water and warming beans, and there's usually something left over at the end of the meal, which must be thrown out. So canned beans and ramen noodles for us. In the mornings, I always boiled water for instant "coffee," and we often had instant oatmeal if it looked like there would be nothing close for breakfast.
The next day, Day 2, got off to a slow start thanks to Jon's flat after a half-mile. The Lewis and Clark route took us to a ferry across the Illinois River (free) and, after a bit of winding around on the peninsula between rivers, another ferry across the Mississippi (not free). At this point, we were heading south-east, a bit discouraging on a trip that needs to go north-west. We would continue southwest the rest of the day, first on roads into St. Charles, MO, and then on the Katy Trail.
In St. Charles we got a bit lost, thanks to not reading the route guide very carefully. These route guides are very good, very detailed, and (mostly) very right. They contain all the information one needs to find one's way, but you need to pay careful attention. On normal maps, you can "sort of" read them and fill in the gaps and get where you're going. On the route guides, you must notice every mark, every road, every street name. We didn't, so we went astray. Rather than roaming aimlessly around St. Charles, we retraced our steps several miles (very discouraging) and tried again. The second time worked, and it took us through a lovely commercial district that had a Walgreen's, where I got a battery for my odometer (very important when using the route guides).
At this point we joined the Katy trail for the rest of day 2, and the first part of day 3, traveling in exactly the wrong direction. But we were committed to following the route guides, so southwest we went. In retrospect, we could have set off on our own up the Illinois shore and done just fine (and taken several days off the trip and avoided some huge hills), but it was interesting to follow the route guides. I'll reflect on the differences between ad-libbing and following route guides later. When you're following a route guide, it feels scary to consider going off the route. In fact, we did better in many ways after we left the route.
Until this point, I hadn't had a copy of the route guide (Lewis and Clark, section 1). It wasn't a big deal, but it made me feel a tad disoriented, not knowing exactly where we were headed. The beauty of the route guides is that both riders always have exactly the same information; one can say to the other, "The guide says we turn in 3.7 miles," meaning, We don't need to think for the next 3.7 miles. Or argue, as the case may be. (Not that we argue that much about routes, but having the route guide as ultimate authority pretty much eliminates disagreement.) I tend to be bossy about routes, and the route guide helps prevent that. Instead of unilaterally announcing, "We're going THIS way!" I can announce, "The route guide says we go THIS way!" There's no arguing with that. Once we hit the Katy trail, we entered the Great Rivers route guide, which we both had.
We camped our second night at Klondike County Park, just short of Augusta. It was a lovely, brand new little park. The shower building even had a camp kitchen in it. We were told that it was completely full the night before (Saturday). On this Sunday night, however, it was mostly empty. Because we hadn't read the route guide carefully, we rode past this campground on our way to Augusta (where we had indifferent burgers and brats in an odd outdoor beer grotto restaurant), which left us the unpleasant prospect of retracing our steps yet again. For such a nice little campground, it was worth it. It was either that or forge ahead to Marthasville and Choo Choo's Custard and Camping . . . sorely tempting, but it was still 12 miles, and who knew if it was open or what it would be like.
The third day was the nicest so far. It
started on the Katy Trail (which is interesting, but not what I'd call
beautiful), but at Marthasville we turned north onto roads. The climb
out of the Missouri River valley was brutal (made more so by Jon's
dispiriting flat tire that came shortly after he crested the summit),
but we then seemed to be on higher ground, with gently rolling hills and
horse farms. This was beautiful biking. Little traffic, lovely scenery.
It steadily heated up during the day on this, the first of a nearly
week-long stretch of hot days. In Troy, we found the franchise strip
with help from my GPS girlfriend, Mrs. TomTom, and settled in to the heavily
air-conditioned Dairy Queen to wait out a torrential rain squall. Good
timing.
This was an interesting segment of the route. First, after Wright City we were put on a dirt road; this, even though Adventure Cycling brags about how well they avoid dirt roads. I sort of like dirt roads (usually they're peaceful and, as long as they aren't covered with loose gravel or sand, or washboards, they're usually very rideable), so this routing didn't bother me. The route guide explained that the traffic is so bad on the paved alternative, that the dirt is worth it. I agree. I liked it.
But one choice that the route guide made on this segment was, flat-out, a catastrophe. After Troy, the route follows state highway 47 for 3.5 miles. The first three miles had a good shoulder, so despite the heavy traffic it was fine. But the last half-mile was a nightmare. The worst segment on the route. We had the bad fortune to hit it at rush hour (I guess, at least as much as Troy gets), and it was a steady stream of pick-up trucks driving very fast. The road had absolutely no shoulder--just a drop-off to a soft shoulder, and the traffic was steady in both directions, so we couldn't count on traffic being able to swing wide around us. I ended up riding on the soft shoulder, which quickly grew old. A half mile is a long way when you're doing that kind of riding on a loaded bike.
It was a great relief to get off the state highway when we entered Cuivre River State Park. The route guide was a little unclear where the campground was . . . at least, at the time it seemed unclear: once we found it, the directions made sense. But because we were entering through the unofficial back entrance to the campground, there were no signs. It was later explained to us that this back entrance was instead of the very hilly front entrance, which made me stop complaining. (And the back entrance came after some not insignificant hills. After the terrible Route 47 trauma, we weren't in the mood for any more hills than we got.)
Cuivre River State Park was nice. A classic state park. We had
bought canned beans and ramen noodles, etc, in Troy, so we set up our
tents and cooked a gourmet dinner on our little alcohol stoves. It was a
perfect dinner. I had Bush's Mexican style black beans. A bit salty,
but good. I cut up summer sausage into it (making it still saltier).
Day 4 was much like Day 3. Beautiful rolling countryside, lightly traveled roads, lots of horse farms. The hills got bigger as we approached Clarksville and the river, which we hadn't seen since before St. Charles. If we hadn't followed the route guide and the Katy Trail, we would have reached Clarksville on the second or third day. Worth the detour? We weren't in a hurry and the riding was lovely (if a bit hilly), so yes, it was worth the detour, I guess. Had we taken the direct route, we would have avoided hills, but we also might have found ourselves on Route 47 for 10 miles. That would have been alarming.
Once we reached Clarksville, we were tired from the hills on County W (although it was beautiful). The route guide said there were restaurants and groceries in Clarksville. Make that a restaurant and a convenience store. I guess that counts as groceries. So we had a late lunch and aimed for Louisiana (Missouri, that is), which had, supposedly, camping in a city park. When we arrived, we searched low and high for said park. We eventually found it, high above the river in a nice neighborhood. They allow camping here? I asked myself delightedly. Well . . . not quite. The route guide didn't quite get it right. When we asked at the police station (as per the route guide) they said, and I quote: "Huh? Hell no, you can't camp there. But you can camp down south of the boat ramp. Just go down past the waste pipe that is spewing toxic effluent into the river. You'll be cozy there." Actually, they didn't mention the pipe or the effluent. Now, I can't prove that it was a former toxic waste site, nor do I know what the foul-smelling effluent was. I just knew I didn't want to camp there.
So off we went to the River's Edge Motel. And guess what? It was right on the river's edge. And it was quite nice. And it had THREE convenience stores next door and across the street. And Louisiana had a restaurant with a good salad bar and a pizza special: Giant pizza with everything on it for $12. Which we couldn't even come close to eating after the good salad bar. We don't got no sense.
But staying in a motel once a week or so is just a nice thing to do. Nothing to be ashamed of. Now ordering that huge pizza . . .
The next day held the promise of hills. We had been warned by several people that the stretch from Louisiana to Hannibal was hilly, so we were apprehensive. But the first 15 miles were absolutely perfect riding, mostly through a river valley, lovely hills on both sides. Easy. We took a break at the foot of the first hill, hoping that perhaps it was the only hill. It wasn't. These were significant hills, one after another, all the way to Hannibal. Not as big as the hill coming out of the Missouri River valley, but big and numerous. Each one had a lovely scenic turnout looking out over the sweep of the Mississippi and into Illinois. We would have happily done with less scenery and more flat, but we tried to enjoy each view as it came along.
When we rolled into Hannibal, we were pretty tired. After a long long downhill to Ilasco and the river, which I thought was, perhaps, the end of the hills, the final payoff, there was one final hill before we reached the city. Annoying. Once in Hannibal, we took a good break. We found a nice little coffee shop in the historic district (surprisingly not called "Mark Twain Joe Shop" or "Becky's Brew" or "A Cuppa Huck" but, instead, Java Jive--what does that have to do with Mark Twain?). We were both impressed with the quality of the wait staff. We spent more than an hour there, recharging electronic doo-dads, drinking coffee, eating sandwiches.
The route guide said that we need to ride on the freeway to cross the river back into Illinois. This was unusual, but I trusted that it was correct. I was completely reassured when I saw the bike route signs pointing up the on-ramp. We crossed over from the hilly western shore to the flat flat flat eastern shore. We saw few hills from this point until northern Illinois, five days later. I like hills, and I don't mind slogging through them, but I also like total flatness, particularly when there's a bit of a tail wind.
We rolled through Quincy (a bit of a rundown city) and found our private campground (a former KOA, renamed Valley View, renamed Driftwood, under a new owner) on the north side. As with KOAs, this campground was adequate, with showers, a pool, electric outlets on the main building where we charged our doo-dads.
Unlike a KOA, there was no camp store where we could buy Beef-A-Roni for our dinner, so we biked back to town and had a very mediocre meal at a biker bar. It was $1 long-neck night, so I had a few. "We have all domestic beers," the waitress said proudly. "How about Miller?" I asked. "Nope." How about Coors?" "Nope." "What do you have?" "Bud Light." "How about regular Bud?" "We have that, too!" That's what I had. Jon and I had fried fish; they looked like catcher's mitts with a little hamburger bun stock in with a toothpick to add class. Not our best meal, but anything tastes good after a hot day of riding through hills.
The route guide had us staying on the Illinois side for another two days before crossing the river into Iowa. But we started getting the feeling that this was not what we wanted to do. First, we liked the flat Illinois side. And we were having trouble seeing campgrounds that were spaced adequately in Iowa, whereas there were plenty of them in Illinois. We had two days to decide. First, we headed to Nauvoo, that Mormon mecca, full of tour buses of the faithful coming to visit the big new temple and see where Joseph Smith met his end.
Nauvoo State Park was one of the more unusual campgrounds I have ever stayed in. It didn't seem to have sites, at least not the tent area. Just a tree-covered hillside sprinkled with picnic tables. We had heard from other bikers that there were no rangers to collect camping fees (which only came to $8, I think), and that proved to be true. Very nice new bathhouse, pleasant enough park. But odd. We set up on the empty hillside, cooked our canned beans and ramen noodles, took showers, went to bed at 10:00, as usual. We had this corner of the campground to ourselves.
But when I looked out of my tent in the morning, I beheld a strange sight. The hillside was covered with people sleeping in sleeping bags and under blankets, and there was a white bus, a repainted school bus, parked next to the tent area. The bus had Idaho plates and was covered with slogans about the virtues of farming and general cheery remarks. ("Hi!" said the swing-out former stop sign on the driver's side.) And as I watched, a man in blue jeans and flannel shirt walked over to the bus, sat down on a picnic table, and commenced reading something, as if he were waiting for the others to get up. And when they did, it turned out there were children, boys and girls, infants through late teens, and some older women, but no older men other than the fellow reading by the bus. And the girls and women all had their long hair in braids, and they were all wearing long 19th-century denim farm-wife dresses.
My first guess, upon seeing the bus, was that these weref 21st-century hippies. But when everyone started stirring, it was clear that this was wrong. The truth of who and what these people probably were was a bit creepy. Jon, of course, went over and tried to strike up a conversation, but didn't have a lot of success. They weren't very chatty.
This was to be our day of decisions. To follow the route guides and cross over into Iowa and leave the river? Or to stay in Illinois and continue along the eastern shore? (It sounds like we were deciding between going to Minas Tirith or going to Mordor.) The Illinois route had a lot going for it, except for the small detail of getting through the Quad Cities, which really looked sprawling and impossible to go around in a reasonable fashion.
We rode the beautiful (flat) farm roads to Dallas City, followed the main highway along the river to Lomax, and continued on past Carman and finally reached the point of no return: Either we would turn left at US-34 and cross over into Iowa, or we would turn right and continue up the Illinois side of the river.
We turned right. For two miles, we wished we hadn't. The east-west roads, particularly the major US highways, are busy. Very busy. Loaded with trucks going between Illinois and Iowa using the few bridges across the river. And narrow. No shoulder. We hurried, we ignored the horns, we tried not to get squashed flat, and we breathed a sigh of relief when we could turn left and leave US-34 behind. We had made our choice. It would be smooth sailing until the Quad Cities. But then what? I figured there had to be a way to get through. It would be on a Sunday morning. If we went early enough, we could probably use major streets.
At this point, we were off the route guides, relying, instead, on Illinois state maps. Although this may seem reckless, with a GPS unit as a backup it works quite well. All the small grey roads on the state map are paved (with one exception that we found the next day), and usually they are (relatively) lightly traveled. With the GPS, it's possible to figure out what they're called and where to turn. (Note that the GPS unit can't be on all the time as in a car, since the battery would run out. So having a GPS that turns on and acquires satellites quickly is very helpful. I have found that my small TomTom works well for this, while my Garmin is much less useful.)
So we worked our way up the small grey and black roads to Oquawka (who knew there was such a town? Says Wikipedia: "Within the city exists a memorial and grave marker to a circus elephant named Norma Jean, who perished on July 17, 1972 after being struck by lightning. The pachyderm was attached to a small circus that performed in the city. Norma Jean was buried on the spot, and the circus, without its star attraction, closed within a year."). Anyway, in Oquawka we bought beans and ramen to take out to Delabar State Park, just north of town.
Usually, the rule of thumb is state park campground = showers; state forest campground = no showers. But north of Oquawka, the rule was turned on its head. Delabar State Park, a run-down, dingy excuse for a state park on the Mississippi, had no showers or flush toilets. Big River State Forest, just a few miles farther north, did have showers. But we didn't know, so we stayed at the state park, our only night without showers. Got chatted up by Ed and his sidekick (perhaps named Junior, perhaps not), who were there to drink beer, fish for catfish, drink more beer, and get away from Ed's bitchy wife (although she joined them later). Nice enough guys. Very chatty. I was glad for my earplugs, because they were noisy at night.
Thanks to Mrs. TomTom, we knew that there was a KOA just south of Rock Island, which would position us nicely for the Quad Cities on Sunday morning. We followed gray roads north and east, encountering a few rolling hills and a smidge of dirt road, but otherwise the riding was OK. Hot, but OK. The KOA was a KOA, which is good and bad. Good because it had really nice showers, laundry, air-conditioned main building, and pool (which I gratefully sank into). Bad because the sites are packed in cheek to jowl, with rocks on the camp drive which make lots of noise as people come and go at all hours. Still, it was fine. We rode into the commercial district and had an awful dinner at KFC. We rode right past a little diner to get there. I'm ashamed, because Jon saw it, but I was so far ahead that he couldn't get my attention. So awful overpriced KFC was our fare.
In the KOA laundry room (where I sat to read my book and enjoy the air conditioning), there was a "Discover the Quad Cities" brochure. I thought, You don't suppose they have information about biking, do you? They did! Turns out there's a paved bike trail that runs the entire width of Rockford and Moline along the river. In fact, the Rock Island Trail, which becomes the Great River Trail (which consists of both separate paths and signed routes on roads) stretches all the way to Mississippi Palisades State Park, 77 miles away and our ultimate destination for the day. Suddenly, getting through the Quad Cities AND making it to the state park 77 miles away seemed possible. Bike path along the river, with a predicted 20 mph tail wind, and no hills. Definitely possible, even in the heat (which was in the 90s).
The riding was easy and nice. The paved trail was delightful (stretching all the way though Rock Island and Moline, and extending quite a few miles north of Moline), and the segments on the roads were clearly marked with relatively little traffic. This was the most we had ridden along the Mississippi during the trip. We followed the river quite closely most of this day, dipping inland occasionally, but always returning to the river. By Savanna, we were tired and ready for dinner, which we ate at Shivers Ice Cream Shoppe.
Palisades State Park was north of town, with the campground nestled into a break in the rocky bluffs (the palisades). When we rolled in, the ranger at the entrance station said, "You must be the last ones!" To which we said, "Huh?" It seems that there was an organized bike tour staying in the campground that night, put on by the League of Illinois Bicyclists. Because it was their first night, they didn't know each other (or us), so they figured we were with them. (There were more than a hundred of them, I think.) We could have marched in to the food tent and helped ourselves to dinner.
We chose a site that was fairly far away from the tour group. They gave us many glances askance as they passed on the way to the bath house, but no one stopped by to say hello. Our theory is that they thought we were renegade members of their group, wanting our privacy (since they didn't know each other yet, they didn't know us, either). In the morning, once they figured out that we weren't with them, there was a steady stream of people stopping by. I don't think we were strutting around as the self-contained bike touring experts, the middle-aged supermen riding from the St. Louis to Milwaukee, since, let's face, it's not that big an accomplishment, but we were happy to chat and learn about their tour and tell them about ours. (Ours seemed more fun. I have never been attracted to big group biking events.)
We had our first (and only) rain of the trip that morning. An hour or so before I usually got up, the heavens opened and dumped for an hour, complete with lightning and thunder. My tent didn't drip, thanks to the seam sealing I had done on the rain fly, but the floor did leak. (The fact that we were camped in a low spot that became a big puddle certainly didn't help.) All the water pooled at my feet, under my air mattress, so nothing important got wet. And, since this was likely to be our last night of camping, even a wet sleeping bag wouldn't have been a big problem. Still, it's aggravating to have a tent leak. (This was an inferior tent in that way. There were big seams across the floor, and along the edges, instead of a wrap-around "bathtub" floor. When I returned home, I emptied several tubes of seam sealer on the floor seams.)
Our goal this day, number 10, was Monroe, WI, 57 miles away, within the acceptable daily distance. We had been spoiled by flat river bottom and strong tailwinds. We knew that would change when we turned inland. We were leaving the Mississippi at Savanna rather than continuing up to Dubuque because we wanted to avoid Lafayette County in Wisconsin, which is notorious for serious hills. We knew we'd hit some hills as we angled up to Monroe, but we hoped to miss the worst of them.
We got off to a bad start. Jon blames me. I blame Mrs. Tomtom, who found us the road leading out of the Mississippi valley that turned out to be dirt. I don't mind dirt, and I didn't mind most of this road. (Jon minded all of it MUCH more than I did.) But when it turned more or less straight up, even I got a bit grumpy. In fact, I walked my bike up the worst of it, which is quite unlike me.
This was a bad start to the day. Jon was more than grumpy. But you know, I had no way of knowing this was a dirt road. I thought it was one of the grey roads on the state map, which are never dirt. (It wasn't the grey road on the map, as it turns out; that one started south of the campground, as I would have figured out if I had looked more carefully.) Mrs. Tomtom doesn't distinguish between dirt and paved roads. It just looked like a nifty way to get over the "palisades."
In any case, once we got up onto the ridge road, the riding was quite lovely. (I think Jon was still too mad at me to appreciate it.) The ridge lasted quite a few miles, so we didn't have serious hills for while.This was lovely country--rolling hills, long vistas. We were following the grey roads on the state map, with the help of Mrs. Tomtom, and mostly it worked as planned. We found paved roads with light traffic that went where we needed them to. At one point, after Stockton, we followed a road that was not on the state map, but that Mrs. Tomtom showed to run parallel to the state highway, which we were inclined to avoid. All went well until . . . more dirt. Ugh. Once we got back on the state highway, we realized that we would have been fine on it right along; but avoiding state highways is good policy, the odds favor it, in general, like putting in a left-handed batter against a left-handed pitcher, so I didn't really regret the alternate route.
When we got to Wisconsin, we hit the Badger State Trail, one of the state's numerous rail-trail conversions. It would take us the last seven miles into Monroe. As usual, I had a love-hate thing going with this packed stone-dust trail: I loved its flatness and absence of traffic. I hated its slowness and lack of interesting things to see. The tentative plan was to follow this trail all the way to Madison, after Monroe, but this would put us an awkward distance for the last two days: 70 miles or so from Madison to Jon's house, with no good campgrounds on the route. The logical place to state was at my in-laws lake house in Lake Mills, but it would be a push.
Because there were no campgrounds near our route within striking distance, we decided to stay in a motel. (Two motels on a nearly two-week trip isn't too bad for a couple of old farts.) Monroe had a very nice Super 8 (my wife is skeptical: a "very nice Super 8"? Seems unlikely. But it WAS very nice. I'd stay there, or in another Super 8, again.) I had the pool and whirlpool to myself. And this one had the added advantage of being close to franchise restaurant paradise. So we had dinner at Culver's and late dinner at McDonald's.
And then it was decision time again: Take a short day on the trail to Madison, followed by a very short day to Lake Mills, setting up the final day of 57 miles or so? Or do a medium day to Lake Mills, skipping Madison and cutting out a day? We opted for the latter. We'd be following the very very good Wisconsin state bicycle map, so figuring the best route was easy. We took the trail for about 20 miles (which included a fantastic DARK tunnel that required lights!), and then turned east on pretty (rolling) county roads. Lunch in Stoughton in our favorite kind of little local restaurant. We ended the day on the Glacial Drumlin Trail (which I have ridden many times). We were given a hero's welcome by my father-in-law, Phil. Dinner in town. (Phil bragged about us to the waitress; we just said Aw shucks twarn't nuthin, which is mostly true.)
The final day would be all trail, specifically the Glacial Drumlin Trail for 40 miles, followed by community trails in Waukesha, New Berlin, and Wauwatosa. Luckily, only the first 20 miles were stone dust. All the rest of the trails this day were paved. Considering how draggy we were, this made a big difference. We rolled in to Jon's driveway about 3:00. I loaded up my bike, jumped in the car, and headed back to Michigan. Trip over.
Final Thoughts:
1. Although the daily mileage was shorter than I would have done by myself, it was pleasant not to be totally exhausted at the end of the day. When I go 70 miles, the last 10-15 miles of the day are usually pretty hard. Lopping those miles off makes a big difference.
2. It's worth carrying cooking gear, but it's not worth trying to do real cooking. Heating up beans and ramen noodles was fine. Boiling water for instant coffee in the morning was also fine. Making a souffle would have been less fine. And on a bike, buying and carrying excessively heavy canned goods for one meal is OK for a few miles. I don't feel the need to carry freeze-dried beef stroganoff, as if I were backpacking, nor would I want to fill up my bags with freeze-dried food for more than a meal or two, even if it weren't so expensive.
3. Route guides are nice, but they change the nature of the experience. They make it possible to travel through a region without really knowing where you are, because you never look at a big, normally oriented map. All you see are the skinny slices of the route, twisted every which way to make them fit on the page. It's not hard to get used to reading them, even with north sometimes pointing downward to the left, but it does change the way you picture the geography of the place. For those of us who love maps, this does make a difference.
The two panels below, from the Great Rivers South guide, illustrate what I mean. To read the top panel, it is necessary to notice that north points down and left. (At least I find it necessary to know that.) So the northbound route is, on this map, going mostly east in the top panel (even though it's pointing up). On the bottom panel, north is now to the left and slightly upward, and the route now goes primarily north. Notice that the maps contain mileages between dots, and stars where the written instructions contain an event (also marked with a star). So you can track your miles by the numbers on the map, or by the relative distance between the stars. It is mostly possible to do without the written instructions; the map is detailed enough. But once I got used to the written instructions, I found myself following them quite obsessively. I was constantly subtracting the mileages in the the instructions from each other, in order to figure out how far to the next event.
After a while, the thought of riding without a route guide is scary, since the guide feeds you every turn, every road name, every distance. (Notice my mark on the lower panel showing a mistaken location for Marcelline. These maps had very very few such mistakes.
4. Once we left the route guide, it worked very well to use a plain state map (I had both the official Illinois state highway map and another that I bought in a gas station) and a GPS unit for reference. I was worried that not having county maps in Illinois would be a problem, but it really wasn't. Staying on the gray (mostly county) highways shown on the state map worked fine.
Although I could get a converter that would allow me to connect the TomTom to my generator hub so that the GPS was on all the time, I don't think I'd like it. Or would I? Hm.
5. My saddle sore problem (as if anyone wanted to hear about that) was not an issue thanks to (a) a "memory foam" saddle cover on my B. 17 saddle, and (b) my J&G loose biking shorts with the fleece liner. Enough said. I was grateful.
And the next tour? Good question. Taking two weeks is disruptive to the family schedule. I think in the future I'll need to limit it to no more than a week. Perhaps I'll start the cross-country-one-week-at-a-time trip next summer. In the meantime, sub-24-hour overnighters will be the bike "tours" of choice.
Jon and I took a longer trip this summer, a trip that started out shorter and in a different part of the country. By the time the planning (or the lack of planning) was done, we were on our way to St. Louis, with the intention of spending the better part of two weeks riding up the Mississippi to Wisconsin, then cutting across to Milwaukee (where Jon lives).
My original plan was to load my Bike Friday into its suitcase and take the train to St. Louis. Jon would have needed to load his LHT into a bike box and check it as luggage . . . except Amtrak doesn't check luggage from Chicago to St. Louis. (Can that be true? It seems impossible . . . what an idiotic lack of service. There's no way to get a bike to St. Louis by Amtrak. This is, alas, typical. Amtrak is not interested in bike riders.)
The solution was to have Jon's incredibly generous wife drive us from Milwaukee to St. Louis (400 miles). We drove down on Saturday, she threw us and our gear out of the car, and then she turned around and headed home the same day. Yikes. She must have been really eager to be rid of Jon for a few weeks.
Our plan was to follow Adventure Cycling route guides as much as possible. I had used their route guides in a half-hearted way before, frequently jumping off the route if it seemed to be taking a longer route than I wanted, but I had never religiously followed a route guide for any distance. So this was to be an experiment.
The advantage of a route guide is that the route is picked for you. No advance planning is necessary. No county maps, no researching camp grounds, just the route guide (and a large state map for reference). We would follow the first few panels of the Lewis and Clark route from Hartford, IL to Marthasville, MO (on the Katy Trail), turn north and follow the Great Rivers South route to Muscatine, IA, and the Northern Tier segment from Muscatine to west of Dubuque, where we would turn eastward.
That was the plan. The reality was a bit different.
As usual, we camped in public and private campgrounds, with two motel nights thrown in where convenient camping couldn't be found. All but one of the campgrounds had showers, which is always nice. In total we stayed in six state or county parks, two motels, two private campgrounds, and one in-laws house.
On previous trips, we have considered days of 65 miles or so to be optimal. As a result, we frequently had 70- and even 80- or 90-mile days, with relatively few days under 60 miles. For this trip, we decided to set the standard distance at 50 miles, meaning that distances of 50-60 would be most common, 60-70 would be less common, above 70 would be only in an emergency. Furthermore, it meant that sub-50-mile days were possible, if we had to choose between that and going 70-plus miles.
We mostly stuck to that standard. We only had one day over 70 miles (with a stiff tailwind and no hills), and only two days over 60. And we did, indeed, have one day under 50 miles, something we never would have allowed in our younger, more pain-tolerant days. All the other days were in the 50-60 mile range. Since we always started out by 7:30 am, this meant we were usually done by early- to mid-afternoon.
The obligatory gear details:
My rig. Rear panniers have rain covers in this photo. |
As I was getting ready for the trip, I noticed that my fancy Velocity Synergy rear wheel was tearing itself apart, with the rim cracking in many places, and spokes pulling out. (See my post here.) I was grateful that I noticed it before we left, but it posed a dilemma: Take the clown bike (that is, the Bike Friday) which is not as good on trails (it rolls noticeably slower), or build a new wheel. I decided to try the latter. I ordered up a touring rim from Velo Orange. The old spokes were a few mm short, but they might work. Bad idea, I know, reusing spokes, particularly on a fully loaded touring wheel, but I didn't have time to get new ones.
So I laced up the wheel, trued it, dished it, stressed it, and crossed my fingers (not 3-cross). I had a week to try it out. In the 100 miles I rode that week, it seemed to be holding. The test would be when I loaded it up. (I had also built the front wheel using a Novatech dynamo hub and an old rim I had lying around, but I wasn't worried about it, since it was already two years old and had never had a problem. Besides, front wheels don't work as hard as rear wheels, nor do they have the asymmetrical stresses caused by dishing.)
Bikes and gear before loading. |
We would be following the Adventure Cycling Lewis and Clark route these first two days, along the river north to the confluence of the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers before crossing into Missouri and following the Katy Trail.
The first flat tire of the trip |
Although he had three flat tires in three days, making us worry that it would be a daily annoyance for the whole trip, they did eventually stop. Flat tires are demoralizing. Not particularly problematic or time-consuming, but demoralizing. Jon's second flat tire happened just as we were starting on the second day, and his third flat tire happened at the top of a huge hill on the third day. There's never a good time for a flat, but both of those were particularly bad times.
The first night we camped in Pere Marquette State Park, which is, technically, on the Illinois River. As with most state parks, this one was quite pleasant and had showers, our big requirement. We had eaten dinner at an ice cream stand in Grafton, so the lack of grocery and restaurant didn't bother us. In general, that was our model: We looked ahead to where we'd be stopping, found the last place prior to our destination that had restaurants or groceries, and stocked up or ate there. Some nights, that meant actually buying dinner. Other nights, we bought canned beans (or their equivalent) to cook on our little alcohol stoves. Even canned beans taste good at the end of a day of riding. There's no point in trying to cook an actual meal starting with fresh wholesome ingredients. It's a giant hassle, the ingredients often cost more than a restaurant would, we can't really buy perishables if we are going to carry them any distance, our catfood can alchohol stoves aren't good for much more than boiling water and warming beans, and there's usually something left over at the end of the meal, which must be thrown out. So canned beans and ramen noodles for us. In the mornings, I always boiled water for instant "coffee," and we often had instant oatmeal if it looked like there would be nothing close for breakfast.
The free ferry across the Illinois River |
In St. Charles we got a bit lost, thanks to not reading the route guide very carefully. These route guides are very good, very detailed, and (mostly) very right. They contain all the information one needs to find one's way, but you need to pay careful attention. On normal maps, you can "sort of" read them and fill in the gaps and get where you're going. On the route guides, you must notice every mark, every road, every street name. We didn't, so we went astray. Rather than roaming aimlessly around St. Charles, we retraced our steps several miles (very discouraging) and tried again. The second time worked, and it took us through a lovely commercial district that had a Walgreen's, where I got a battery for my odometer (very important when using the route guides).
The Katy Trail, west of St. Charles |
Until this point, I hadn't had a copy of the route guide (Lewis and Clark, section 1). It wasn't a big deal, but it made me feel a tad disoriented, not knowing exactly where we were headed. The beauty of the route guides is that both riders always have exactly the same information; one can say to the other, "The guide says we turn in 3.7 miles," meaning, We don't need to think for the next 3.7 miles. Or argue, as the case may be. (Not that we argue that much about routes, but having the route guide as ultimate authority pretty much eliminates disagreement.) I tend to be bossy about routes, and the route guide helps prevent that. Instead of unilaterally announcing, "We're going THIS way!" I can announce, "The route guide says we go THIS way!" There's no arguing with that. Once we hit the Katy trail, we entered the Great Rivers route guide, which we both had.
We camped our second night at Klondike County Park, just short of Augusta. It was a lovely, brand new little park. The shower building even had a camp kitchen in it. We were told that it was completely full the night before (Saturday). On this Sunday night, however, it was mostly empty. Because we hadn't read the route guide carefully, we rode past this campground on our way to Augusta (where we had indifferent burgers and brats in an odd outdoor beer grotto restaurant), which left us the unpleasant prospect of retracing our steps yet again. For such a nice little campground, it was worth it. It was either that or forge ahead to Marthasville and Choo Choo's Custard and Camping . . . sorely tempting, but it was still 12 miles, and who knew if it was open or what it would be like.
Klondike County Park |
Abandoned farmhouse on County O |
This was an interesting segment of the route. First, after Wright City we were put on a dirt road; this, even though Adventure Cycling brags about how well they avoid dirt roads. I sort of like dirt roads (usually they're peaceful and, as long as they aren't covered with loose gravel or sand, or washboards, they're usually very rideable), so this routing didn't bother me. The route guide explained that the traffic is so bad on the paved alternative, that the dirt is worth it. I agree. I liked it.
But one choice that the route guide made on this segment was, flat-out, a catastrophe. After Troy, the route follows state highway 47 for 3.5 miles. The first three miles had a good shoulder, so despite the heavy traffic it was fine. But the last half-mile was a nightmare. The worst segment on the route. We had the bad fortune to hit it at rush hour (I guess, at least as much as Troy gets), and it was a steady stream of pick-up trucks driving very fast. The road had absolutely no shoulder--just a drop-off to a soft shoulder, and the traffic was steady in both directions, so we couldn't count on traffic being able to swing wide around us. I ended up riding on the soft shoulder, which quickly grew old. A half mile is a long way when you're doing that kind of riding on a loaded bike.
It was a great relief to get off the state highway when we entered Cuivre River State Park. The route guide was a little unclear where the campground was . . . at least, at the time it seemed unclear: once we found it, the directions made sense. But because we were entering through the unofficial back entrance to the campground, there were no signs. It was later explained to us that this back entrance was instead of the very hilly front entrance, which made me stop complaining. (And the back entrance came after some not insignificant hills. After the terrible Route 47 trauma, we weren't in the mood for any more hills than we got.)
Cuivre River State Park, MO |
Day 4 was much like Day 3. Beautiful rolling countryside, lightly traveled roads, lots of horse farms. The hills got bigger as we approached Clarksville and the river, which we hadn't seen since before St. Charles. If we hadn't followed the route guide and the Katy Trail, we would have reached Clarksville on the second or third day. Worth the detour? We weren't in a hurry and the riding was lovely (if a bit hilly), so yes, it was worth the detour, I guess. Had we taken the direct route, we would have avoided hills, but we also might have found ourselves on Route 47 for 10 miles. That would have been alarming.
The view from Henderson Riverfront Park, where we weren't allowed to camp. |
River's Edge Motel, Louisiana, MO |
But staying in a motel once a week or so is just a nice thing to do. Nothing to be ashamed of. Now ordering that huge pizza . . .
The next day held the promise of hills. We had been warned by several people that the stretch from Louisiana to Hannibal was hilly, so we were apprehensive. But the first 15 miles were absolutely perfect riding, mostly through a river valley, lovely hills on both sides. Easy. We took a break at the foot of the first hill, hoping that perhaps it was the only hill. It wasn't. These were significant hills, one after another, all the way to Hannibal. Not as big as the hill coming out of the Missouri River valley, but big and numerous. Each one had a lovely scenic turnout looking out over the sweep of the Mississippi and into Illinois. We would have happily done with less scenery and more flat, but we tried to enjoy each view as it came along.
A scenic pullout south of Hannibal |
The route guide said that we need to ride on the freeway to cross the river back into Illinois. This was unusual, but I trusted that it was correct. I was completely reassured when I saw the bike route signs pointing up the on-ramp. We crossed over from the hilly western shore to the flat flat flat eastern shore. We saw few hills from this point until northern Illinois, five days later. I like hills, and I don't mind slogging through them, but I also like total flatness, particularly when there's a bit of a tail wind.
Crossing back into IL on the freeway |
Unlike a KOA, there was no camp store where we could buy Beef-A-Roni for our dinner, so we biked back to town and had a very mediocre meal at a biker bar. It was $1 long-neck night, so I had a few. "We have all domestic beers," the waitress said proudly. "How about Miller?" I asked. "Nope." How about Coors?" "Nope." "What do you have?" "Bud Light." "How about regular Bud?" "We have that, too!" That's what I had. Jon and I had fried fish; they looked like catcher's mitts with a little hamburger bun stock in with a toothpick to add class. Not our best meal, but anything tastes good after a hot day of riding through hills.
Houses on stilts along the river north of Quincy |
Nauvoo State Park was one of the more unusual campgrounds I have ever stayed in. It didn't seem to have sites, at least not the tent area. Just a tree-covered hillside sprinkled with picnic tables. We had heard from other bikers that there were no rangers to collect camping fees (which only came to $8, I think), and that proved to be true. Very nice new bathhouse, pleasant enough park. But odd. We set up on the empty hillside, cooked our canned beans and ramen noodles, took showers, went to bed at 10:00, as usual. We had this corner of the campground to ourselves.
Our "site" in Nauvoo State Park |
My first guess, upon seeing the bus, was that these weref 21st-century hippies. But when everyone started stirring, it was clear that this was wrong. The truth of who and what these people probably were was a bit creepy. Jon, of course, went over and tried to strike up a conversation, but didn't have a lot of success. They weren't very chatty.
This was to be our day of decisions. To follow the route guides and cross over into Iowa and leave the river? Or to stay in Illinois and continue along the eastern shore? (It sounds like we were deciding between going to Minas Tirith or going to Mordor.) The Illinois route had a lot going for it, except for the small detail of getting through the Quad Cities, which really looked sprawling and impossible to go around in a reasonable fashion.
River bottom land in Illinois |
We turned right. For two miles, we wished we hadn't. The east-west roads, particularly the major US highways, are busy. Very busy. Loaded with trucks going between Illinois and Iowa using the few bridges across the river. And narrow. No shoulder. We hurried, we ignored the horns, we tried not to get squashed flat, and we breathed a sigh of relief when we could turn left and leave US-34 behind. We had made our choice. It would be smooth sailing until the Quad Cities. But then what? I figured there had to be a way to get through. It would be on a Sunday morning. If we went early enough, we could probably use major streets.
Dallas City, IL |
So we worked our way up the small grey and black roads to Oquawka (who knew there was such a town? Says Wikipedia: "Within the city exists a memorial and grave marker to a circus elephant named Norma Jean, who perished on July 17, 1972 after being struck by lightning. The pachyderm was attached to a small circus that performed in the city. Norma Jean was buried on the spot, and the circus, without its star attraction, closed within a year."). Anyway, in Oquawka we bought beans and ramen to take out to Delabar State Park, just north of town.
The route into Warsaw, IL |
Thanks to Mrs. TomTom, we knew that there was a KOA just south of Rock Island, which would position us nicely for the Quad Cities on Sunday morning. We followed gray roads north and east, encountering a few rolling hills and a smidge of dirt road, but otherwise the riding was OK. Hot, but OK. The KOA was a KOA, which is good and bad. Good because it had really nice showers, laundry, air-conditioned main building, and pool (which I gratefully sank into). Bad because the sites are packed in cheek to jowl, with rocks on the camp drive which make lots of noise as people come and go at all hours. Still, it was fine. We rode into the commercial district and had an awful dinner at KFC. We rode right past a little diner to get there. I'm ashamed, because Jon saw it, but I was so far ahead that he couldn't get my attention. So awful overpriced KFC was our fare.
Great River Trail in Rock Island, IL |
The riding was easy and nice. The paved trail was delightful (stretching all the way though Rock Island and Moline, and extending quite a few miles north of Moline), and the segments on the roads were clearly marked with relatively little traffic. This was the most we had ridden along the Mississippi during the trip. We followed the river quite closely most of this day, dipping inland occasionally, but always returning to the river. By Savanna, we were tired and ready for dinner, which we ate at Shivers Ice Cream Shoppe.
Palisades State Park was north of town, with the campground nestled into a break in the rocky bluffs (the palisades). When we rolled in, the ranger at the entrance station said, "You must be the last ones!" To which we said, "Huh?" It seems that there was an organized bike tour staying in the campground that night, put on by the League of Illinois Bicyclists. Because it was their first night, they didn't know each other (or us), so they figured we were with them. (There were more than a hundred of them, I think.) We could have marched in to the food tent and helped ourselves to dinner.
We chose a site that was fairly far away from the tour group. They gave us many glances askance as they passed on the way to the bath house, but no one stopped by to say hello. Our theory is that they thought we were renegade members of their group, wanting our privacy (since they didn't know each other yet, they didn't know us, either). In the morning, once they figured out that we weren't with them, there was a steady stream of people stopping by. I don't think we were strutting around as the self-contained bike touring experts, the middle-aged supermen riding from the St. Louis to Milwaukee, since, let's face, it's not that big an accomplishment, but we were happy to chat and learn about their tour and tell them about ours. (Ours seemed more fun. I have never been attracted to big group biking events.)
We had our first (and only) rain of the trip that morning. An hour or so before I usually got up, the heavens opened and dumped for an hour, complete with lightning and thunder. My tent didn't drip, thanks to the seam sealing I had done on the rain fly, but the floor did leak. (The fact that we were camped in a low spot that became a big puddle certainly didn't help.) All the water pooled at my feet, under my air mattress, so nothing important got wet. And, since this was likely to be our last night of camping, even a wet sleeping bag wouldn't have been a big problem. Still, it's aggravating to have a tent leak. (This was an inferior tent in that way. There were big seams across the floor, and along the edges, instead of a wrap-around "bathtub" floor. When I returned home, I emptied several tubes of seam sealer on the floor seams.)
Our goal this day, number 10, was Monroe, WI, 57 miles away, within the acceptable daily distance. We had been spoiled by flat river bottom and strong tailwinds. We knew that would change when we turned inland. We were leaving the Mississippi at Savanna rather than continuing up to Dubuque because we wanted to avoid Lafayette County in Wisconsin, which is notorious for serious hills. We knew we'd hit some hills as we angled up to Monroe, but we hoped to miss the worst of them.
We got off to a bad start. Jon blames me. I blame Mrs. Tomtom, who found us the road leading out of the Mississippi valley that turned out to be dirt. I don't mind dirt, and I didn't mind most of this road. (Jon minded all of it MUCH more than I did.) But when it turned more or less straight up, even I got a bit grumpy. In fact, I walked my bike up the worst of it, which is quite unlike me.
This was a bad start to the day. Jon was more than grumpy. But you know, I had no way of knowing this was a dirt road. I thought it was one of the grey roads on the state map, which are never dirt. (It wasn't the grey road on the map, as it turns out; that one started south of the campground, as I would have figured out if I had looked more carefully.) Mrs. Tomtom doesn't distinguish between dirt and paved roads. It just looked like a nifty way to get over the "palisades."
Northeast IL, near Stockton |
When we got to Wisconsin, we hit the Badger State Trail, one of the state's numerous rail-trail conversions. It would take us the last seven miles into Monroe. As usual, I had a love-hate thing going with this packed stone-dust trail: I loved its flatness and absence of traffic. I hated its slowness and lack of interesting things to see. The tentative plan was to follow this trail all the way to Madison, after Monroe, but this would put us an awkward distance for the last two days: 70 miles or so from Madison to Jon's house, with no good campgrounds on the route. The logical place to state was at my in-laws lake house in Lake Mills, but it would be a push.
Because there were no campgrounds near our route within striking distance, we decided to stay in a motel. (Two motels on a nearly two-week trip isn't too bad for a couple of old farts.) Monroe had a very nice Super 8 (my wife is skeptical: a "very nice Super 8"? Seems unlikely. But it WAS very nice. I'd stay there, or in another Super 8, again.) I had the pool and whirlpool to myself. And this one had the added advantage of being close to franchise restaurant paradise. So we had dinner at Culver's and late dinner at McDonald's.
And then it was decision time again: Take a short day on the trail to Madison, followed by a very short day to Lake Mills, setting up the final day of 57 miles or so? Or do a medium day to Lake Mills, skipping Madison and cutting out a day? We opted for the latter. We'd be following the very very good Wisconsin state bicycle map, so figuring the best route was easy. We took the trail for about 20 miles (which included a fantastic DARK tunnel that required lights!), and then turned east on pretty (rolling) county roads. Lunch in Stoughton in our favorite kind of little local restaurant. We ended the day on the Glacial Drumlin Trail (which I have ridden many times). We were given a hero's welcome by my father-in-law, Phil. Dinner in town. (Phil bragged about us to the waitress; we just said Aw shucks twarn't nuthin, which is mostly true.)
Jon emerging from the tunnel on the Badger State Trail |
Final Thoughts:
1. Although the daily mileage was shorter than I would have done by myself, it was pleasant not to be totally exhausted at the end of the day. When I go 70 miles, the last 10-15 miles of the day are usually pretty hard. Lopping those miles off makes a big difference.
2. It's worth carrying cooking gear, but it's not worth trying to do real cooking. Heating up beans and ramen noodles was fine. Boiling water for instant coffee in the morning was also fine. Making a souffle would have been less fine. And on a bike, buying and carrying excessively heavy canned goods for one meal is OK for a few miles. I don't feel the need to carry freeze-dried beef stroganoff, as if I were backpacking, nor would I want to fill up my bags with freeze-dried food for more than a meal or two, even if it weren't so expensive.
3. Route guides are nice, but they change the nature of the experience. They make it possible to travel through a region without really knowing where you are, because you never look at a big, normally oriented map. All you see are the skinny slices of the route, twisted every which way to make them fit on the page. It's not hard to get used to reading them, even with north sometimes pointing downward to the left, but it does change the way you picture the geography of the place. For those of us who love maps, this does make a difference.
The two panels below, from the Great Rivers South guide, illustrate what I mean. To read the top panel, it is necessary to notice that north points down and left. (At least I find it necessary to know that.) So the northbound route is, on this map, going mostly east in the top panel (even though it's pointing up). On the bottom panel, north is now to the left and slightly upward, and the route now goes primarily north. Notice that the maps contain mileages between dots, and stars where the written instructions contain an event (also marked with a star). So you can track your miles by the numbers on the map, or by the relative distance between the stars. It is mostly possible to do without the written instructions; the map is detailed enough. But once I got used to the written instructions, I found myself following them quite obsessively. I was constantly subtracting the mileages in the the instructions from each other, in order to figure out how far to the next event.
After a while, the thought of riding without a route guide is scary, since the guide feeds you every turn, every road name, every distance. (Notice my mark on the lower panel showing a mistaken location for Marcelline. These maps had very very few such mistakes.
4. Once we left the route guide, it worked very well to use a plain state map (I had both the official Illinois state highway map and another that I bought in a gas station) and a GPS unit for reference. I was worried that not having county maps in Illinois would be a problem, but it really wasn't. Staying on the gray (mostly county) highways shown on the state map worked fine.
Although I could get a converter that would allow me to connect the TomTom to my generator hub so that the GPS was on all the time, I don't think I'd like it. Or would I? Hm.
5. My saddle sore problem (as if anyone wanted to hear about that) was not an issue thanks to (a) a "memory foam" saddle cover on my B. 17 saddle, and (b) my J&G loose biking shorts with the fleece liner. Enough said. I was grateful.
And the next tour? Good question. Taking two weeks is disruptive to the family schedule. I think in the future I'll need to limit it to no more than a week. Perhaps I'll start the cross-country-one-week-at-a-time trip next summer. In the meantime, sub-24-hour overnighters will be the bike "tours" of choice.
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Velocity Synergy Rims—The Final Chapter
In a fitting conclusion to a sad story of defective rims, which weren't quite the size they said they were, here's how my four-year-old Synergy rear rim ended up. Normal daily commuting use (carrying perhaps a 10-lb bag on the rear rack plus my 175 lbs). I'll send the rims to Velocity to see what they say. I never got around to showing them these rims, which were smaller than 700C, even though Velocity offered to look at them. See my previous post here.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Bicycling in Brasilia! Not.
We're in Brasilia (Brazil, that is) for a week, doing music education consulting. It's summer here, biking season. My original thought was to load the Bike Friday into its suitcase and bring it along, but after reading a little about biking (and walking) in Brasilia, I decided against it. I'm glad I did.
It would have been possible to ride here (in Brasilia), but really unpleasant. The city is organized around two axes, both of which have a many-lane road connected to other roads by clover-leafs. There would be no happy way to get from our hotel (roughly at the intersection of the axes) to anywhere a person would like to bike. I suppose I could have putzed around some of the smaller side streets (or taken my chances on the busy arteries), but I prefer to walk if all I'm doing is exploring. (Walking is a bit of a challenge here, too. There are few official cross walks and pedestrian traffic signals. It involves lots of dodging cars while jay-walking across 8-lane roads.)
I have seen very few bikes in town. There were some people riding on the main highway out of town to the north, but it was basically a freeway. Not a lot of fun, and not easy to get to from here, anyway.
I don't mind the city; it's nice enough, as inland cities go. The architecture of the federal buildings is spectacular. It's just not very good for biking.
It would have been possible to ride here (in Brasilia), but really unpleasant. The city is organized around two axes, both of which have a many-lane road connected to other roads by clover-leafs. There would be no happy way to get from our hotel (roughly at the intersection of the axes) to anywhere a person would like to bike. I suppose I could have putzed around some of the smaller side streets (or taken my chances on the busy arteries), but I prefer to walk if all I'm doing is exploring. (Walking is a bit of a challenge here, too. There are few official cross walks and pedestrian traffic signals. It involves lots of dodging cars while jay-walking across 8-lane roads.)
I have seen very few bikes in town. There were some people riding on the main highway out of town to the north, but it was basically a freeway. Not a lot of fun, and not easy to get to from here, anyway.
I don't mind the city; it's nice enough, as inland cities go. The architecture of the federal buildings is spectacular. It's just not very good for biking.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)